Archive for July, 2012

Madras Week 2012 – Heritage Tours

July 31, 2012

Madras Musings Heritage Tours to commemorate Madras Week

Saturday 18th August – 6.00 am – Tracing the old fort wall of Madras. Tour by van and foot for two hours, followed by breakfast. Guide: Sriram V, Charges : Rs 600 per head.

Sunday 19th August – 6.30 am – The vanished and surviving theatres of Mount Road. Tour by van and foot for two hours, followed by breakfast. Guide: Mohan V Raman, Charges : Rs 600 per head.

Saturday 25th August – 6.30 am – The heritage of Alwarpet. Tour by van and foot for two hours, followed by breakfast. Guide: Sriram V, Charges : Rs 600 per head.

Sunday 26th August – 6.30 am – How the harbour developed. Tour in collaboration with the Royal Madras Yacht Club by van, foot and boat, followed by breakfast. Guide: Sriram V, Charges: Rs 850 per head. Optional: Lunch at the RMYC and a speed boat journey in the sea at Rs 200 extra. Bookings for this walk close on 19th August. Those interested must furnish copy of proof of identity along with payment.

Bookings for all walks to be done by email at editor@madrasmusings.com

The Madras Mail

July 30, 2012

Sir Charles Lawson

Madras has had a long journalistic tradition, the first publication dating back to the 1780s. In the 1830s, two new papers made their appearance – The Spectator and The Madras Times. The latter took over the former and was in turn acquired in 1859 by Justinian Gantz, who ran Gantz & Son, booksellers and printers with their offices in Broadway. 1859 was the year when Madras fought the income tax and in this it found an able ally in The Madras Times. The content of the paper was in the hands of Charles Lawson and Henry Cornish, two able journalists. When Lawson and Cornish broke with The Madras Times and set up The Madras Mail, the city got a powerful newspaper.

The Madras Mail, founded in 1868, was the true representative of commercial interests. Lawson was close to most of the top-ranking business houses of First Line Beach and after a brief stint in rented offices on Second Line Beach, The Madras Mail moved to the first floor of A D’ Rozario, Auctioneers at 6, First Line Beach. This building, no longer in existence was the southern neighbour of the State Bank building. Lawson took an active interest in the affairs of the Madras Chamber of Commerce of which he was elected Secretary on 24th November 1862. The Chamber had till then not been lucky in the matter of Secretaries with the incumbents leaving to take up Government and other assignments. Lawson was to be Secretary for 30 long years. A room was specially built for the Chamber in the Madras Mail’s new address. In 1869 therefore, the Chamber shifted from the Arbuthnot building to the offices of The Madras Mail.

In 1886, when the golden jubilee of the Madras Chamber came about, the Chairman, George G Arbuthnot, on behalf of the members, placed on record “the very valuable services rendered to the Chamber by Mr Lawson who had filled the office of the Secretary for twenty-four years. He was sure that all members of the Chamber and especially all office-bearers, would be in full accord with himself on the opinion that the Chamber had received the greatest possible assistance from Mr Lawson, who indeed might be regarded the right hand of the Chamber and to whom, in a great measure, the Chamber was indebted for the success and influence which it has obtained. He therefore begged to propose:-
“That on this, the fiftieth anniversary of its foundation, the Chamber desires to put on record its high appreciation of the very valuable services rendered to it by its Secretary, Mr Lawson who has now held that office for twenty-four years”.”
The proposition was carried unanimously.

Lawson travelled to England in 1887 and on 30th June, presented to Her Majesty Queen Victoria, the Madras Presidential Address of Congratulation on the completion of the Jubilee Year of her reign. The Queen was pleased to confer on him the honour of a knighthood. Sir Charles as he now became, continued his work with The Madras Mail and the Chamber till 1892, when he resigned the office of Secretary much to the Chamber’s regret. The Chamber continued occupying its room in The Madras Mail building till 1920 and the newspaper continued being its voice. AE Lawson, Sir Charles’ son, had taken over as editor from his father in 1892 and he also became Secretary to the Chamber. It is noteworthy to point out that he was also Sheriff of Madras that year. AE Lawson was Secretary of the Chamber till 1917. When he returned to England that year, TE Welby became editor of The Madras Mail and also Secretary to the Chamber.

During these years, there was a strong rivalry between The Madras Times which was more sympathetic to the native and The Madras Mail which was pukka sahib. But by 1921 all that was a matter of the past, with the Madras Mail and the Madras Times being both merged under the leadership of John Oakshott Robinson, a takeover tycoon of his times and then the Chairman of Spencers. The merged entity, under the ownership of Associated Publishers, changed its name in 1928 to The Mail. But with the ownership now in the hands of one closely connected with the Madras Trades Association, the link with the Chamber was somewhat weakened. Editors of The Mail ceased being Secretaries of the Chamber.

Following the merger, The Madras Mail moved from First Line Beach. Its new offices were on Mount Road, in magnificent premises built specially to house a newspaper. It was to have a long an illustrious life on that busy thoroughfare, having a second golden period from 1928 to 1955 when it was under the editorship of AA Hayles. In 1945, it changed hands once again, this time being acquired by Amalgamations Limited and its visionary founder – S Anantharamakrishnan.
An eveninger right through its life, The Mail was to find competition and political interference tough to endure. The latter in particular was to sound its death knell. Any editorial criticising the Government was to see repercussions by way of strikes in the group company and neighbour, Simpsons. The Mail lived on to celebrate its centenary and finally closed shop in 1981. It is yet to fade from collective memory.
Its erstwhile friend and ally, the Madras Chamber of Commerce, had a longer career on First Line Beach. After the Mail left, it moved in 1924, post a brief stay at Best & Co, to the Mercantile Bank building (now the HSBC). It remained there till 1940 when it moved into the new art deco styled Dare House. It had a long stay there till 1984. Then it moved briefly into a bungalow on Kasturi Ranga Iyengar Road before finally coming home to roost at the Karumuthu Centre on Mount Road in 1990.

This article was published in XS Real’s blog -http://www.xsreal.com/blog/?p=211

My souvenir collection

July 27, 2012

http://epaper.timesofindia.com/Default/Scripting/ArticleWin.asp?From=Archive&Source=Page&Skin=TOINEW&BaseHref=TOICH%2F2012%2F07%2F27&PageLabel=4&EntityId=Ar00401&ViewMode=HTML

Whither VP Hall restoration?

July 26, 2012

Will it ever be like this again?

It is now three years since the restoration of Chennai’s historic Victoria Public Hall began. Since then several dates have been announced for its re-dedication to the public and all of them have gone by. The last missed deadline was end-June. There has been no official announcement since then and the only news item is disturbing – a few tiles fell off the roof very recently probably owing to vibrations caused by the Metrorail construction work. What exactly is happening within those stately interiors?

The Chennai Corporation, which took possession of VP Hall following a prolonged tussle with the erstwhile Trust that governed it, announced a Rs. 3.39 crore restoration programme in 2009. This was to be financed by the Jawaharlal Nehru National Urban Renewal Mission (JNNURM). It is worth pointing out here that one of the conditions for State Governments to access this fund for civic projects is a commitment to restore heritage – both built and natural.

The Corporation had announced that the restoration would be monitored by a team comprising, among others, representatives of INTACH, the School of Planning and Architecture and IIT Madras. As to whether these members are actively involved is not known, but certain aspects of the restoration would appear to indicate otherwise. Chief among them was the haste with which the staircases of the building were all removed followed by a statement to the effect that these would be replaced with new ones.

Though we have had assurances to the effect that only traditional construction techniques would be used, it cannot be denied that the work is -completely in the hands of the Government machinery. Their record in heritage restoration is not exactly glorious. A recent example is the restoration of the Madras GPO where, in the name of security, circular stairways were removed and access to certain parts of the building were permanently cut off. All this in the name of restoration.

Reverting to VP Hall, it was first estimated that work would be completed by early 2011. This was then extended to May and later to September 2011. The change in regime did not exactly help either and deadlines were further extended to May and later to June 2012.

In the midst of all this came an announcement that a sound and light show was being planned within the compound. This was touted as a grand tourist attraction which would document the history of the city. But the Metrorail soon put paid to that. A part of the compound was taken over for storing construction material and drilling work began a few feet away. Plans for the show were shelved. It is also to be noted that despite several assurances from Metrorail that it would be careful in handling the heritage precinct, among the first acts was the shifting of the historic Trevelyan fountain from the building front to one of the sides, a process in which some of its ornaments were damaged.

Authorities are also silent on what they plan to do with VP Hall once it is restored. Will it in true Chennai tradition be kept locked after its renovation as seen in the cases of the Connemara Library, Rajaji Hall and Senate House currently there are some vague noises being made about the first floor of VP Hall possibly being let out for events. But with no parking space in the vicinity and no proper access at least till Metrorail completes its work, hosting any event here is bound to be a challenge.

And so, that is where matters stand at the moment. Watch this space for further developments.

First in bus accidents – a dubious record for Chennai

July 25, 2012

If it is 30 per year in Mumbai, 69 per year in Bangalore and 83 in Delhi, it is 112 in Chennai. We are speaking of the number of fatal accidents involving buses run by city transport corporations. That is a first that Chennai will not be proud about. The recent toppling over of a bus from the Gemini flyover has only served to highlight the poor safety record that our Metropolitan Transport Corporation enjoys. And this is despite the city having the smallest fleet strength among the Indian metros. The question is, what are we doing about it?

Officialdom is rather expectedly in denial mode. It claims that Chennai has one of the best accident-reporting systems and hence its figures are higher. This implies that other cities are choosing not to report the correct statistic. Whatever be the truth in that claim, Chennai’s figure is alarming and it would do well to ponder over what it can do to bring it down to international standards.

One of the most common reasons for accidents is over-speeding on the part of the MTC buses. Using their sheer size to their advantage, these vehicles do not seem to obey any traffic rules. They jump signals, bulldoze their way through traffic and pay scant heed to the protests of other road users. The police, long frustrated in their attempt in bringing any errant MTC driver to book, have chosen to give up and watch with indifference. Other cities have installed speed-governors in their buses which set off alarms each time the bus exceeds 50 kmph in speed. In Chennai too these were installed amidst much fanfare but they are functioning on very few buses now.

Many of the MTC drivers who ply vehicles on dense traffic routes are inexperienced. They are not trained sufficiently. This is to be contrasted with Mumbai where only drivers with over five years of experience are allowed to drive buses on arterial roads. This policy has seen the number of accidents come steadily down in that city over the past two years. BEST, which is the local operator, is hoping to reach international standards in safety this year.

While it may not be true of all bus drivers, alcohol and substance abuse remains a real problem that is, of course, not endemic to drivers in Chennai alone. But other cities have found ways to tackle this menace. In Bangalore, it is now the practice to check the alcohol levels in the driver’s blood each time a bus leaves the depot. There is also the question of stress. And certainly, driving all day on our roads is perhaps the most stressful occupation. The State has undertaken to provide courses in yoga to the bus drivers, but these have been half-hearted attempts with poor follow-up sessions.

The maintenance of most MTC buses is said to be abysmal. In the Gemini flyover accident, the driver has claimed that his seat buckled under him at the crucial turn and this caused him to press the accelerator. A recent report had it that the MTC has fared very poorly in recruiting technical staff. Against a prescribed ratio of 1.25:1 of technicians vs buses, MTC manages with 0.8:1 and some depots have only two technicians when the required number is 12. Added to this is the high salary structure of the MTC which translates into Rs. 3000 per bus per day. That leaves very little for maintenance. And with buses during peak hours carrying two to three times the permitted number of passengers, breakdowns are more frequent. Despite receiving Central Govern-ment aid for upgrading its maintenance facilities, MTC has very little to show for it.

All this does not show our transport system in a good light. And it also shows scant respect for human safety. With the MRTS also receiving its share of brickbats, when will our city’s transport infrastructure become world-class?

Molony and his views on Chennai’s civic sense

July 24, 2012

Just ask any Chennaiite to list the city’s civic woes and the answer will be unvarying. Garbage mounds, bad roads, poor drains and chaotic traffic. A daunting list indeed. Not included in it, but one that’s above all would be the civic indiscipline practised by the people themselves. Official records and writings of visitors, officials and administrators since 1639 reflect the same.

One example is A Book of South India written by J. Chartres Molony in 1926. Long out of print, it has recently been reissued. Deftly written with gentle humour, it is an eminently readable work. Extensive references abound in the book on the civic administration of Madras, for Molony was president of the Corporation from 1914 to 1919. Nothing appears to have changed since then.

How about beginning with the shoddy laying of drains? “Efficient drainage is a prime necessity of a city and the drainage of Madras was a heartbreaking affair. A drainage system had once been attempted on the cheap, with the natural and inevitable result that the work had to be undone and done afresh.” Repeated digging made the Madras citizen regard the “drainage department as a nightmare.” To us, it is all familiar stuff.

Next is the problem of garbage — its handling by citizens and the Corporation. Here is what Molony has to say: “The output of rubbish from an Indian house is astonishing. The Madras householder, having collected his rubbish was wont to sling it broadcast into the street. The winds of Heaven blew the fragments hither and thither and the sweeper chased them. I raged still more against the practice when I saw the householder emerge five minutes after the rubbish-cart had passed his door and redecorate with ashes and plantain leaves the street which the sweeper had just swept clean.” At least Molony did not have to deal with plastic waste.

The sweepers were no paragons of virtue even then. “They swept well enough so long as I, or someone else in authority looked after them; but I do not think that it occurred to them that there was any reason, other than the whim of an insane master, for sweeping at all.” His harrying led them to strike work. Garbage piled up.

Molony’s tenure saw the number of motorised vehicles increase. He noted rather presciently that Madras would soon choke with vehicles. “The old roads were made for the traffic of horse carriages and bullock carts. This traffic, by reason of its slowness was never intense at any moment. The roads crumbled under the swirl of private cars and commercial lorries.” I wonder what he would say now.

This man, who loved South India and in particular Madras, is commemorated in a street in T. Nagar, for it was during his time that plans for that area were drawn up. The name has since metamorphosed on signboards into Melanie Road. Is that due to the proximity of a Griffith Road?

This article appeared in The Hindu dated 24th July 2012 in the Hidden Histories column

Rashtropoti Bho…

July 23, 2012

Rashtropoti Bhobhon

Short and Snappy dated 16th July 2012

July 23, 2012

Travails of public speaking

They collect in droves all around the city and flourish. And like Abou Ben Adhem, their tribe increases all the time. The Man from Madras Musings is not referring to mosquitoes but to social groups. They call themselves by various names, have their rules. Some are exclusive to members of one sex. Most are upper class with the public reputation of membership being open only by invitation. In reality, most are on the prowl for members all the time and the only criterion for selection, at least in MMM’s eyes, is a well-endowed wallet. But, be that as it may, no matter what be the society or group, one aspect is fairly common, namely the necessity to hold periodic meetings – which can be weekly, fortnightly or monthly – and serve food and have a speaker to hold forth on a subject. The last named is where MMM comes in. He is, as they say, much sought after.

And in a long career of being invited to speak, MMM can say with authority that most of these places lack the very basics of meeting etiquette. Several of these organisations, after extending a warm invitation and confirming a date, will conveniently forget to give information about the venue and time. The location is often fixed at the last minute and who should be the last to receive the information but the speaker. MMM has on several occasions had to call up and ascertain the venue. He has often also been sorely tempted to simply stay away on the pretext of not knowing the venue but has never put it into practice, merely out of sense of pity for the principal organiser who probably has several things on his/her plate.

Perhaps too much on his/her plate to even turn up at the event that he/she organised. MMM has many a time landed up at a venue only to find that the person who invited MMM has chosen to be AWOL. On such occasions, members of the club or society have looked on MMM as an intruder and whispered among themselves as to who MMM could be (the cleaner, or the chappie who was to bring the refreshments? – these being common speculations). It has been left to MMM to break the ice and rather uncertainly introduce himself as the speaker. After which there would be the inevitable fawning and the slow breaking of the news that XYZ who organised everything could not make it.

Next is the introduction. Here MMM has noticed several kinds. The majority comprises the type that boldly marches up, introduces itself and says that it has been saddled with the job of introducing the speaker. It then goes on to confess that the task was just entrusted to it and so since MMM is a closed book as far as it is concerned, could MMM give it a printed CV? Then there is the other type which breezily says that it has to introduce MMM and so would he oblige with a few top-of-line details? These are then vaguely committed to memory. When the introduction takes place, it is a mix of fact and fiction. There is a third variety which thinks it has to be flippant about the speaker, perhaps in revenge for the pain and punishment of listening to whatever he has to say thereafter. The last one resorts to endless praise and hyperbole and speaks longer than the invited speaker.

The audience is invariably thin at these events. Many, no doubt, wisely opted to stay away. MMM has in an earlier column lamented about events where the organiser expects the speaker to make up a crowd and so he will desist from repeating himself. But an audience comprising the President and Secretary of the society/club, a couple of others, and the caterer’s representative is hardly any encouragement.

And as for the Vote of Thanks, the less said the better. By then most of the audience wants to leave or, if the event is pre-prandial, is keen on the refreshment counter. At this time rises the Voter of Thanks who either tries to repeat all that MMM said or to begin a point by point critique, adding what he/she thinks were relevant points that MMM could have included but missed – all of which, in fact, MMM cut out keeping time schedule in mind. After all, unlike the Voter of Thanks, MMM had a fixed time duration for his speech.

Fond farewells

If those of you who made it thus far thought that ended the travails of The Man from Madras Musings, let MMM assure you that you are sadly mistaken. A recent public speaking episode at one of those hi-tech buildings that go by the name of Park or City in the Taramani vicinity, stands out in MMM’s memory. The speech over, MMM was thanked briefly and shown the door. What he was not informed about was that the parking area of the hi-tech ‘city’ was an overgrown forest, which had not looked so intimidating in the evening when MMM had driven in. Now, much later and the sun having long set, it was full of dark and mysterious shadows. Leaves rustled and out of the undergrowth came creepies and crawlies that wound themselves lovingly around MMM. And the only light that there was came from MMM’s cell-phone which was already warning MMM that the battery was low on charge. After a couple of twists (of the ankle) and a turn, MMM could dimly see a line of parked cars. He identified his only by repeatedly pressing the remote and praying for a response.

Once in the car, MMM had to make his way out of the parking lot and, presto, he found himself at the rear entrance of the hi-tech city. This was not so hi-tech, for it contained the left-over construction material from the hi-tech wonder and it also housed the remnants of the rural street that was probably uprooted to make way for the hi-tech. MMM had to ask his way to civilisation. There was not a street light in the entire stretch. Kindly shapes and voices asked MMM to keep going straight till he came to a political party’s flag-post at which spot he was to turn left. What the helpful ones had omitted to mention was that the flag-posts in the area outnumbered the resident population.

After several false turnings and quite a few muttered prayers, MMM found himself at a street corner. And then there it was – the Chennai that MMM knew – fumes, buses, cars, traffic jams. With a song on his lips, MMM drove home. But not before mentally resolving never to venture near these hi-tech cities and parks. In MMM’s rather limited view, all this talk of these buildings being repositories of wisdom and the best of civilisation is a sham. What sort of buildings are these if they create islands of affluence, completely cut off from the chaos and sordidness of their immediate environs? And they probably only added to the mess, for Taramani was till not long ago a sylvan oasis.

Tailpiece

News has it that all schools in the State are to be closed this week on a particular day. The Man from Madras Musings learns that this is to conduct an aptitude test for teachers. Now, what better way to test this than give them a day off from what they are supposed to have an aptitude for? Or, is there some message in all this?

Remembering Alangudi Ramachandran

July 20, 2012

This is a year of birth centenaries in the world of Carnatic Music. Madurai Mani Iyer, Palghat Mani Iyer, T. Brinda, Alathur Srinivasa Iyer… the list of vocalists is long. Tucked away in the middle of these is Alangudi K. Ramachandran, one of the foremost ghatam exponents of his era. There is however, very little information available on him in the public domain.

Born on June 22, 1912, Ramachandran studied with percussionist Kuttalam Kuppuswami Pillai and his son Sivavadivel Pillai before apprenticing himself under the thavil maestro Needamangalam Meenakshisundaram Pillai. However, it would appear that despite the great lineages from which he acquired his art, the initial years were ones of struggles. And as it happened in the case of several others who made it big, it was Chembai Vaidyanatha Bhagavatar who provided the early crucial breaks.

Ramachandran has acknowledged this in a letter he wrote on August 2, 1954, to Ellarvi, Chembai’s biographer. “It was Sriman Chembai Vaidyanatha Bhagavatar who introduced me to the music world” he wrote. “He made me accompany him at various concerts, gave me performing opportunities and encouraged me to play well. He has been a great support to me and I will never forget it.” The association with Chembai was to be lifelong and the latter’s last concert in October 1974 had Ramachandran providing ghatam accompaniment.

It was during the process of grooming under Chembai that he came to the notice of his friend and accompanist T. Chowdiah. The warm-hearted and affectionate master of the seven-stringed violin took him under his wings and furthered his career. One of these opportunities was a performance during the Navaratri durbar in Mysore. Ramachandran arrived at the palace in his usual attire – a dhoti, a ‘mel thundu’ and no shirt. The durbar bakshis objected to this as proper protocol demanded that artists wear the usual levy costume of turban and close-necked coat. On coming to know of this Chowdiah intervened and spoke to the Maharajah who immediately and perhaps the only time, waived the dress regulations. Ramachandran performed and was duly honoured.

The next success came at the Music Academy. Up until 1947, the august body held firm to its rules that mandated that no upa-pakkavadyam was needed for Carnatic performances. The ghatam, moharsing and ganjira artists were kept away. Sometime in the mid 1940s, Ramachandran became a regular accompanist for M.S. Subbulakshmi’s performances, the introduction probably being made by T. Chowdiah. Those were the years when M.S. was boycotted by the Music Academy for her role in promoting Tamil Isai. Peace was made in 1947, when guru Semmangudi became the Sangita Kalanidhi. The Academy needed M.S.’ support in raising funds for its new auditorium and invited her to perform. She sang on December 28, that year, and perhaps to emphasise her point, included several Tamil songs in her performance. And, more significantly, she became the first artist to sing for the Academy with an upa-pakkavadyam in addition to violin and mridangam. The performer was Alangudi Ramachandran.

N. Rajagopal in his book The Garland, notes that “Ramachandran was one of the ghatam experts who brought out the hidden, unnoticed capabilities of the pot and was given respect for rich, imaginative and attractive play accompanied by intricate fingering.” In B.M. Sundaram’s view, as stated in a monograph, he took the status of the ghatam to its pinnacle.

Apparently, Ramachandran was very particular in selecting his ghatams and firmly believed that while it could not be tuned, each pot had a pitch of its own and while taking a pot to a concert, the instrument selected ought to be as close as possible to the pitch of the performer. His house had an array of ghatams, all neatly arranged and each bearing a sticker indicating as to which musician it was most suited for. Among his favourites were GNB and Madurai Mani Iyer. When the latter died, a tearful Ramachandran, it is said, smashed all the pots that had stickers bearing Mani Iyer’s name. A few months before his death, Mani Iyer had, in February 1968, arranged the debut concert of his nephew T.V. Sankaranarayanan. The accompanists on that occasion were T.N. Krishnan, Vellore Ramabhadran and Alangudi Ramachandran.

Ramachandran travelled abroad as well, going to Sri Lanka, the Edinburgh Music Festival and countries in Europe. The end, rather aptly, but sadly all too soon, came on stage as well. This was at a concert at the Shanmukhananda Sabha in Mumbai on June 15, 1975. According to The Hindu, which reported briefly on the matter on the 16, “Mr Ramachandran complained of pain in the chest during the performance and a doctor was called in to examine him but he died shortly afterwards.”

(The author can be contacted at srirambts@gmail.com)
This article appeared under the Encore column in The Hindu dated 20th July 2012

Going overboard on Rajesh Khanna

July 19, 2012

Let me assure one and all that I am a fan of Rajesh Khanna’s early films. But I still feel that we have gone overboard in mourning the passing of a man who was a superstar for 10 years only. After that he was a mess. His later movies (I remember one called Maqsad) were egregiously bad. And so why does a national newspaper which would have reported Sivaji Ganesan’s passing as “veteran actor passes” devote four columns on page 1 to Kaka? Is it a case of kakka?

Based on this, I have left my mind run wild and here are some aspects that have been left out:

1. Arnab Goswami – A panel discussion with Dimple, Tina Munim and Anju Mahendru – Did Rajesh Khanna die of old age or did he miss his fans?

2. A statement from MK- Thambi Rajes was always a lover of Tamil and this is evident in the films of Devar that he acted in. He must have also been sympathetic to Eelam. So I demand a statue of his be put up on the Marina. If I had been in power, it would have been done.

3. PB Srinivos – I have composed a raga called Rajeshkhannapriya. I have also composed a poem on him

4. Mamata Bannerjee’s ultimate tribute – He was not a maoist

5. S Muthiah (after it was explained as to who Rajesh Khanna was) – We will declare Madras Week as Rajesh Khanna week

6. His ardent follower Sriram V – These will be the list of Madras Musings talks for Madras (sorry, Rajesh Khanna week)

19th – S Muthiah – The Anju Mahendru photo that hangs in the Madras Cricket Club – this will also be the subject of a Madras Miscellany column with several postman’s knocks afterwards.

20th – Sriram V – The stories of some of Kaka’s films. A powerpoint presentation

21st – Karthik Bhatt – The Gujarati connection – Rajesh Khanna and Tina Munim

22nd – Sushila Ravindranath – Did his films make money for theatres in Madras?

23rd (Madras day) – Release of first-day cover depicting Rajesh Khanna in Devar’s Haathi Mere Saathi

Talk by Mohan Raman – Kakavum Yaanaiyum

24th – Randor Guy – What Kaka did while not shooting in Madras

25th – Shobha Menon – Trees that Rajesh Khanna ran around in wet clothes while shooting in Madras

26th -Chitrahaar/Oliyum Oliyum special – Song and dance sequences from Rajesh Khanna films

It is also reliably learnt that the Federation of City Based Sabhas has declared that this year’s Music Festival will be dedicated to Rajesh Khanna. All singers must include at least one song each on Rajeshwari and Kannan. The dance programmes must include Rajesh Khanna’s typical movements of angular head shakes and jogging. Lec dems will include a special discussion on the Karanas in Kaka’s Dance.A slew of new awards – Sangita Kakanidhi, Sangita Kaka Shikhamani, Isai premnagar, Sangita Kakacharya etc will be instituted.

However Kalakshetra will not participate in this as it will be busy filing court cases against itself. It has also refused to change its name to Kakakshetra.

Any more ideas welcome


Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 1,132 other followers

%d bloggers like this: